The theory of employee relations Essay

Employment relationsIntroduction Conventionally, employees argon deemed to precipitate for various reasons. From scholarly works, a strike is defined as suspension in payoff as the workers and their employers engage in the attain commensurate way of dividing the trim that has been achieved within their relationship. (Metcalf and David, 1993) From modern perspective, strikes involves at least one of the list parties having some private information that they do not want the other party to get hold of ab show up this suspected surplus. In empirical perception, strikes ar generally considered to be r be. From the findings of economists they nonplus concluded that strike good examples are usually rampant du elude the business cycle peak, and strikes duration is considered to be limited when the economy is strong. adopt activities are evidently influenced by legislative environment, particularly that legislation that restricts use of replacement of workers (Blyton and Turnbull , 2004). An employees labor value is greater compared to the wage provided by the employer, that is afterward considering the relationship of commerce. This in return provides an opportunity for rise of surplus that is to be divided among the employee and the employer. Thus, a strike is considered as the act of suspending production as the devil sides gets into an argument on how to divide this surplus amicably. The guardian, yes striking is a human right, this command is given by the international treaties voluntarily accept by British successive governments this same treaties are being bound by the United Kingdom (The Guardian, 2011). According to the guardian, British government has been directed by the international participation on human rights to relax the al coiffure existing restrictions and cease treating lawful strikes as a breach rather than suspension of employment contract to the employees. If the British law intersect with the international obligations, then i t would not be easy for the bully employers to unilaterally suspensions of the striking employees (The Guardian, 2011). Mills and Quinn (1982) In an ideal competitive situation, employment surplus is not real individual employers compete with other employers, who are concerned with biding salary and wages to the point when it matches employee laborer value, also the individual workers go out too compete with other fellow workers who tend to bid their remunerations until they meet the one that has been scheduled by the various(prenominal) employers. From this assumption an employee who tends to strike they are at a time replaced by other equivalent works who meet the demands of the potential employer (Brenner, Aaron, Benjamin and Ness, 2009). The worker who is willing to take this bid takes the day. This situation also happens to the employers, also employers who listen to reduce the workers salary and wage they will receive a set substantiate as the potential workers will m ove to the employer who is ready and willing to provide that remuneration that the worker is willing to work for. Through this, the workers are thus able to replace their former employers with other favorable employers enceinte out competitive prices (Zeidler and F crying(a), 1968). Lambert and Bartlett (2005) Evidently, it is genuine that strikes will happen if and solo if there is an extra income from production that both the employer and the worker see that it is outlay fighting for, hence strike will never occur in a noncompetitive market of labor. Despite the strikes being human rights, they also inquire to be viewed with a credible mind. Through a sound mind one is able to make a viable decision that will figure out the whole mess amicably. This will need personnel who will explain the likelihood of a strike occurring and then recommending means of settlement, thus there could not be either wastes brought about by strikes (Hicks paradox of 1932). Critically building o n Hicks paradox, we are enabled to suggest that the devil parties are fighting for some life-or-death information that each want to keep peculiarly the employer. Apparently the associated wastage realized through strikes is considered a cost of trying to obtain this information especially on the part of the employee as they initially lack this beta information that they know will relieve them the bondage of underpayment (Rosenbloom and Joshua, 1996). To hurl a clear brain of these analogies it is important to get a glimpse of what the workers strike theories hold for better explanation. There are various theories that will help to give a reason as to why really workers in the essential services need to go on strike for their grievance to be hard, by either group understanding or through their respective Unions. Unions go on strike when they are sure that the employer is to meet their demands without undergoing any financial crisis. These theories are of the essence(p) as th ey are the ones that give these marrows a bargain ground as illustrated below (Barrett and Boyd, 1914).Institutionalization possible action This particular theory is attributed two gentlemen Hartman and Ross according to Bean perspective (Bean, 1994) the theory asserts institutional mechanisms of negotiating, such as common bargaining protocols helps to reduce the supposed conflicts that are bound to occur due to the strike. Olafsson (1982), perspective about the theory, suggest that for mellowedly positive industrial systems relations are comm solitary(prenominal) associated with reduced conflict directs. Some countries that believe in this theory behave been associated with reduced strike conflict level these countries include Norway, Sweden, and Denmark are some of the singled out as the unique examples the countries that have developed industrial peace model, associated by centralized movement of labor, they also have comprehensive means of negotiations, and lastly th ey have the legal regulations that are effective in controlling strike activities and disputes procedures. Hale (2008) from the study of conducted by Harmatan and Ross determined the factors that influenced strike activities in countries of study. The study found that the countries that have stable labor unified movements that are recognized and willingly accepted and with intensively developed common bargaining protocols are the ones that experience industrial peace. Hartman and Ross concluded centralized bargaining systems minimize levels of industrial conflicts in the field of essential services delivery. This is due to the claim of the two that employers and workers organization are at a point to put real behavioral limits within their respective members.Implicit or Relational contract theory Implicit or relational theory, asserts that there exist a contract between workers and employer Unions, the theory is based in an infinitely revenant practice with imperfect monitoring . Kelly (2002) has it that, conflict is unavoidable terminations of informational asymmetries. The various resolutions of conflicts, strikes slow down, dismissal, low morel, and resignations are not essentials by themselves ingredients of this theory. For instance the strikes will seem to have a zero impact generally under particular configurations, as the conflict is present, but assumes another form. Blyton and Turnbull (2004) indicates that the high efforts and the high pay initiatives agreements between unions and the respective employer is possible to be supported Public Perfect Nash equilibrium of a recurring causa. If these particular players are deemed to be patient enough, just at the cost with haphazard reversions for inefficient series of actions, through which strikes and inflexible wages, or outsourcing and slowdown is bound to take place. This theory suggest that at equilibrium, the respective unions goes on strike apparently when the provided wage has been consi dered to be too low and the exact state nature reality, considered information by the employer to be private and has never been revealed to the workers union. Hence, this behavior is turned to be rational in a recurring interaction framework this eventually causes necessary cooperation in the good times.Principal Agency theory Johnson and Ashenfelter model suggests that strikes happens only when the salary expectations of the file and the rank do not meet at a common ground with what the prospective employer is ready to pay their staff. In case the union directors present a low salary contract for reviewing. In the situations when the file and the ranks wage expectation are high, then the rank and the file are regarded with an attempt to selling out to that responsible management. When the higher up mention statement happens, instead of risk dissension the workers union leaders would like to strike internally (Blyton and Paul, 2004). The major aim of an internal strike is to c onvince the employees be massiveing to the union that the wage they are expecting is not possible. According to Hale (2008) the grassroots function of a strike is to square up the memberships wage expectations with what the firm is willing and ready to pay the workers the implication the theory is that the unions salary demand should come down during a strike time. From another perspective this theory receives some critics on the ground that the wage require are merely based on factor of conjecture, instead of being derived from the bargaining process (Metcalf and David, 1993).The theory of private information As it has been outlined from the above discussion, the employer usually holds some crucial information that normally interests the worker about their working conditions, especially the payment part. This theory thus states that strikes are illustrated well by this private information in regard to the critical aspect important in reaching an agreement, for instance the firm s willingness for payment (Metcalf and David, 1993). Why do the workers have to strike? According to the theory of private information, workers only go on strike because this is the only credible means through which they are able to communicate the so called private information. The theory also claims that a company with great willingness to compensate their workers does it with high salary without the employees going to a strike. However, this is also true that the company with low interest of settling the worker, they end up paying the workers low wages because they are ready receive the strike and its impacts. The theory is crucial in the application in strikes when is considered to be bilateral monopoly setting, through this the employees union and the firm bargain with information that is asymmetrical, or when the informational conflict is between leaders union, file, and the rank. conformation this theoretical information is worth noting that private information is never ve rified at low cost among other theories. Employees do not strike only for economic reasons they can also strike in demand of working conditions improvement, or with aim of mutual aid, and protection of the workers in another union. This statement work out a factor called job satisfaction within the employees which can be defined as that emotional condition that come as a result of appraisal of an employees job. The statement suggest workers develops negative of positive attitudes towards their work or specific sections of the job mainly through, an internal state of mind of respective individuals, generally it is that consideration of our belief, behaviors, and our feelings. When job satisfaction is positive, this can result from favorable working terms workers are considered to be active. Workers activeness is determined from the output of production, move workers produces quality services because they are able to employ fully their potentials. Unmotivated workers results in u nder production as they are not willing to utilize their potentials for the benefit of the employer.The outcomes of strikes in the essential services sector Despite of strike being a human right through which they can air their grievance, strikes are associated with adverse effects that come aftermath the strike has taken place. The results can either be positive, that is the demands of the workers are met and sometimes the results will be negative not favoring the claims of the striking workers. So the striking workers are always prepared for any of these twoutcomes in their efforts to manages and influence the consideration of their needs being addressed with human arouse from their employers through the union or at times through the individual employees alone. Considering the 1919 the General Winning strike according to the Canadianonline.com, it resulted to adverse effects. Among them, the metal workers were compelled to go back to work without a dime increase in their pay that they were demanding, this sounds like they just wasted their time. The employees had to be sent to jail, the foreign workers were deported, and hundreds of others had to be demoted. Seven ring leaders of the strike received a two years conviction for conspiracy of trying to overthrow the government. Apart from these negative results still some intimacy good came out of it. Eleven of the labor candidates who won the seats out of these four of them were the strike leaders. The General Winning Strike made strike in Canada to receive a collective ground for bargaining after almost 20 years. This suggests that within these 20 years the working condition in Canada was compared to hell since both the unions and the workers had no power to bargain for their wage increase even when there was a surplus with the scope of production. Though this the economy of Winnipeg greatly went down for a long time. This also resulted in a social stratification that is the north was classified as the working class and the south as the Troy state other area of essential service sector let us consider the teaching sector. Brison, David and Smith (2006) form the reports that evaluated the impacts of the Ontario teachers strike of 1975 to early 1976. Studies were in the respective schools lagged backside because they started just after the end of the strike and also there was lack of cooperation from the teachers. Though the study conducted found no effect that was no effect on the change of student grades. The other study in the same subject also came out with different suggestions, concerning students attitudes towards their teachers. Surprisingly the strike did not affect the attitude towards their respective teachers. From the third study that was concerned with the school attendance resulted into a null hypothesis. The rate of learners dropout was evident from the results that were obtained especially from grade 9 to grade 13. The study concluded that a strike has an imp act on student dropout and also on movement to postsecondary education. Ahmed and Syed (1989) Cumulative the strikes are regarded to have negative outcomes on the academic performance of the students especially in the senior grades, particularly in learning such subjects like science and mathematics where learning involves summation of knowledge. Even though the strikes did not have any focus on teachers effects from external sources it is realized that after the strike event the teachers became less idealistic in regarding teaching profession as a calling but rather a job just like any other (Matheson and superordinate,2006).Recommendations and conclusion From the above reviews, there is a revelation that there is a strong relationship between strikes actions and job satisfaction. In the countries that have high job satisfaction, strike incidences are limited or never exist and the reverse is true for other countries. The studies show that low industrial conflict levels are asso ciated with greatly developed industrial relation systems. Among the recognized countries experiencing the benefit of industrial peace are Finland, Sweden, and Norway since that have unified and stable labor movements, in increase to these they also have a collective platform of bargaining that are accepted by the employers. This hence recommends that each country must try to have greatly developed systems in the industrial relations, also should have a well designed collective bargaining policies which has to be recognized and then accepted by the works across the labor sector and also the government and the employers must accept these terms. There is a need then for the country to have constant to review conditions of the worker to match the current economic situation with this review the workers and the employers will not engage in a fight for the surplus production. The authorities also have a moral responsibility of ensuring that there are annual forums that joins the empl oyer and the workers with their respective ministries to discuss the current issues affecting the various parties with the expect of addressing this issues at the preliminary before cropping up to create unwanted strikes. Timely strikes aversions are crucial, since it helps to reduce the possible social, political, and economic results of the strike. This calls upon the government responsible ministries to be mindful of the challenges that the workers can face. Unions should act strongly to fight the policy of temporal workers replacement. Replacing workers reduce the strength of having a common bargaining for their demands. Once the employer has replaced the striking employee, production process goes on as usual hence thinking about the servicing worker who is on strike will be a thing that has been put aside for a while.ReferencesBlyton, Paull, and Peter Turnbull. The dynamics of employee relations. 3rd ed. Houndmills, Basingstoke,Hampshire Palgrave Macmillan, 2004. Print.Blyt on, Paul. The theory of employee relations. na na, 2004. Print.Brenner, Aaron, Benjamin Day, and Immanuel Ness. The encyclopedia of strikes in American history. Armonk, N.Y. M.E. Sharpe, 2009. Print.Guardians veto bank visiting cardbut not over president.(Economy Money and its impact). Iran Times International 7 Jan. 2011, ed, sec. Print.Hale, Dominic. International comparisons of labour disputes in 2006. Economic &38 Labour Market check up on 2.4 (2008) 32-39. Print.Kelly, John E.. Rethinking industrial relations mobilization, collectivism and long waves. Taylor & Francis e-Library ed. London Routledge, 2002. Print.Metcalf, David, and Jonathan Wadsworth. Do strikes pay? 1992. Print.Metcalf, David H.. New perspectives on industrial disputes. London Routledge, 1993. Print.Mills, Daniel Quinn. Labor-management relations. 2nd ed. New York McGraw-Hill, 1982. Print.Zeidler, stark(a) P.. Rethinking the philosophy of employee relations in the public service. Chicago Public Personnel Ass ociation, 1968. Print.Ahmed, Syed M.. The effects of the joint cost of strikes on strikes in Canadian manufacturing industries a streak of the RederNeumannKennan theory. Applied Economics 21.10 (1989) 1353-1367. Print.Barrett, E. Boyd. Effects of strikes. Dublin Office of the Irish Messenger, 1914. Print.Brison, David W., and Anthony H. Smith. The effects of Ontario teachers strikes on students summary and integration of three component studies. Toronto Ontario Ministry of Education, 1978. Print.Matheson, Victor A.. The Effects Of Labour Strikes On Consumer Demand In Professional Sports Revisited. Applied Economics 38.10 (2006) 1173-1179. Print.Winnipeg General Strike 1919. About.com Canada Online. Web. 7 Mar. 2014. .Collections of the United Farm Workers of America. Woodbridge, CT first Source Media, 2009. Print.Hain, Peter. Political strikes the state and trade unionism in Britain. Harmondsworth, Middlesex, England Viking, 1986. Print.Lambert, Josiah Bartlett. If the workers to ok a notion the right to strike and American political development. Ithaca, N.Y. ILR Press, 2005. Print.Report of proceedings at the fourth ordinary Congress of the International Federation of Trade Unions Held at the Grand Palais, Paris, from August 1st to 6th 1927 together with reports of the Conferences of the International Trade Secretariats, and t. capital of The Netherlands International Federation of Trade Unions, 1927. Print.Rosenbloom, Joshua L.. Strikebreaking and the Labor Market in the United States, 1881-1874. Cambridge, Mass. National Bureau of Economic Research, 1996. Print.Source document